A leader from Bitdefender Labs. An MDR analyst who runs production defense. An offensive security veteran who runs red team operations. Their shared question: as AI accelerates both sides of the attacker-defender contest, who's actually winning and where does that leave prevention?
For the past decade, much of the security industry has bet that prevention would lose ground to detection-and-response and that "assume the breach" would become the only viable posture as attacks grew faster, more sophisticated, and increasingly AI-augmented.
Three perspectives rarely in the same conversation will explore:
| Why prevention-first architecture creates structural advantages | |
| What advanced attacks actually look like in production environments | |
| What attackers know about defender blind spots that most defenders don't see in themselves. |
The discussion grounds the AI question in operational reality: why defenders can institutionalize AI capabilities at organizational scale that individual attackers and even organized threat groups cannot match, and what an AI-enabled SOC looks like when research, telemetry, and defense share the same intelligence layer.
Speakers
.png)
.png)
